In order to analyze the effect and uniformity of herbicide application during the integrated irrigation of micro-spray water and herbicide, the experiment of applying herbicide with water in the field micro-spray belt is carried out in Wuwei. The commonly used 32 oblique 5-hole micro-spraying belt is used as irrigation equipment, with a length of 40 m. Under the normal working pressure of 55 kPa and the total dose of 1.522 5 kg/hm2, the concentration of the liquid in the applicator is adjusted (test area A: 1.5 g/ L, area B: 2.0 g / L, area C: 3.0 g / L) The herbicidal effect and uniformity of application of the micro-spray zone with herbicide application with water are analyzed. The results show that the test A, B and C areas are in the direction of vertical micro-spraying zone, and the control effect of weed plants increases first and then decreases, which is consistent with the water distribution of micro-spray zone. In the case of the same total herbicide volume, at the 3 m position of the micro-spray zone, A1 and B1 and C1 are significantly different (P<0.05), and the difference between the two concentrations at 20 m is not significant. There is a significant difference between A1, B1 and C1 at 37 m (P<0.05). The uniformity of the weeds in the direction of the micro-spray belt gradually decreases, and the uniformity of the vertical micro-spray belt becomes larger and then smaller. The uniformity of weed control in test area C is significantly lower than that in areas A and B. The uniformity Cu of A and B areas was around 0.98, and the maximum value of Cu in area C was 0.98, and the minimum value is only 0.78. The difference is significant. Based on the improvement of the uniformity of the micro-spraying application and the weed control effect, the concentration of 2.0 g/L is better when the herbicide is applied by the micro-spraying water.
Key words
integrated application of water and medicine /
herbicide /
uniformity of application /
control effect of weed plants /
micro-spray belt
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]张学军,吴政文,沈雪民.多孔式微喷带的研究与应用[J].节水灌溉,2000(3):32-35.
[2]PRABAKARAN G,VAITHIYANATHAN D,GANESANM. Fuzzy decision support system for improving the crop productivity and efficient use of fertilizers[J].Computers and electronics in agriculture,2018,150:88-97.
[3]杨筠晴. 轻小型汽油微喷灌溉机组的应用性能及微喷带喷洒试验研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2017.
[4]张学军,吴政文,丁小明,等.微喷带水量分布特性试验分析[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(4):66-69.
[5]张硕,王文娥,胡笑涛.运用激光雨滴谱仪分析微喷带水量分布特性[J].节水灌溉,2017(11):31-33,37.
[6]张学军.利用低压管道灌溉系统实施高效微喷灌技术[J].农村实用工程技术,2001(7):14-15.
[7]陈林.浅谈大豆田杂草种类、危害、发生特点及除草剂选择原则[J].农民致富之友,2016(13):127.
[8]程功,魏义长,王维超,等.除草剂随滴灌水施用的除草效果及对烟草生长的影响[J].河南农业科学,2016,45(4):85-90.
[9]马冬梅,杨金霞.农药减量控害技术防治棉铃虫田间药效试验[J].农村科技,2016(3):39-40.
[10]WANG D, YATES S R, ERNST F F,et al.Volatilizationof 1,3-dichloropropene under different applications methods [J].Water air soil poll, 2001,127(1):109-123.
[11]王利民,战书涵,裴晓洋,等.竹炭固相萃取-分散液相微萃取-气相色谱/质谱检测水中酰胺类除草剂[J].广东化工,2018,45(11):252-254.
[12]吴春英,白鹭,谷风,等.超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时检测水中16种芳氧苯氧丙酸酯类除草剂[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(5):97-101.
[13]汤吉利,施乃志.根部滴灌内吸杀虫剂防治杨扇舟蛾等害虫试验[J].江苏林业科技,2001(6):26-28.
[14]蒋世义.滴灌棉田除草剂药效及安全性评价![J].新疆农垦科技,2015,38(7):47-49.
[15]郭晓君,封云涛,李光玉,等.3%甲酰氨基嘧磺隆OD对夏玉米田杂草的防效及安全性[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(2):259-261.
[16]张蕾,霍治国,王丽,等.气候变化对中国农作物虫害发生的影响[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(6):1 499-1 507.
[17]张华.小麦白粉病的发病原因及综合防治对策[J].河南科技,2013(12):222.
[18]韩文霆. 喷灌均匀度评价指标及其计算方法研究[C]∥ 中国青年农业科学学术年报. 北京:中国农学会,2004:5.
[19]范军亮,张富仓,吴立峰,等.滴灌压差施肥系统灌水与施肥均匀性综合评价[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(12):96-101.
[20]BURT C M. Rapid field evaluation of drip and micro-spray distribution uniformity[J].Irrigation and drainage systems,2004,18(4):275-279.