The Effects of Different Furrow Irrigation on Potato Growth and Quality

LIN Bao-jun,YANG Chang-yu ,WANG Chun-hong

PDF(247 KB)
China Rural Water and Hydropower ›› 2020 ›› (4) : 102-106.

The Effects of Different Furrow Irrigation on Potato Growth and Quality

  • LIN Bao-jun1 ,YANG Chang-yu1 ,WANG Chun-hong1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

To reveal the influence of different furrow irrigation ways on potato growth and quality, three irrigation treatments, alternating furrow irrigation (AFI), conventional furrow irrigation (CFI) and fixed furrow irrigation (FFI), are set up to study the changes of stem diameter, plant height, leaf area expansion rate, yield and internal quality of potatoes under different irrigation models, and to evaluate them comprehensively by subordinate function value method. After 35 days of seedling emergence, the plant growth rate of AFI treatment was obviously higher than that of CFI and FFI treatment; the yield of fresh potatoes increased by 10.43%, 40.24%, the commercial potato rate increased by 30%, 48.43% compared with the other two treatments; the starch and protein content of potatoes treated by AFI were significantly higher than those treated by CI and FFI. Through the analysis of subordinate function value method, the components of yield and quality of potato under three irrigation modes and 10 indicators such as stem diameter, plant height and leaf area were comprehensively evaluated. Alternate furrow irrigation was the best performance. At the same soil moisture level, alternative furrow irrigation has significant advantages in promoting the growth of stem diameter, plant height and leaf area of potatoes, and can significantly improve their economic yield and commercial potato rate, as well as improve their quality.

Key words

potatoes / alternate trench irrigation / plant height / stems thick / leaf area / yield / quality

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIN Bao-jun,YANG Chang-yu ,WANG Chun-hong. The Effects of Different Furrow Irrigation on Potato Growth and Quality. China Rural Water and Hydropower. 2020, 0(4): 102-106

References

[1]蔺宝军,张芮,高彦婷,等.西北地区高效节水灌溉技术发展现状及对策[J].水利规划与设计,2019(3):29-33.
[2]王在柱,李鹏,郭玲玲.浅析我国水资源利用现状及农业节水灌溉对策[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2013(4):42-43.
[3]王文娥,薛城,胡笑涛.沟灌三角形长喉道田间量水槽水力特性试验及数值模拟[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(3):109-116.
[4]康绍忠,张建华,梁宗锁,等.控制性交替灌溉:一种新的农田节水调控思路[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997(1):4-9.
[5]康绍忠,潘英华,石培泽,等.控制性作物根系分区交替灌溉的理论与试验[J].水利学报,2001(11):80-86.
[6]张永胜,成自勇,张芮,等.控制性交替隔沟灌溉对甜椒农田蒸散特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):223-227.
[7]王旭,孙兆军,杨军,等.几种节水灌溉新技术应用现状与研究进展[J].节水灌溉,2016(10):109-112,116.
[8]曹琦,王树忠,高丽红,等.交替隔沟灌溉对温室黄瓜生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):47-53.
[9]谢开云,王晓雪,张若芳,等.隔沟交替灌溉对我国半干旱地区马铃薯水分利用的影响[J].中国马铃薯,2012,26(1):5-10.
[10]王雪梅,曹红霞,韩红亮.水氮耦合对隔沟灌溉温室番茄品质的影响[J].西北农业学报,2017,26(8):1 197-1 201.
[11]徐存东,程慧,王燕,等.基于HYDRUS-3D不同沟灌方式下水盐运移模拟[J].节水灌溉,2017(10):9-14.
[12]冯静霞.不同沟灌模式对甜椒生长和产量的调控效应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(6):22-28.
[13]王富胜,潘晓春,张明,等.定西市马铃薯种薯产业可持续发展途径[J].中国马铃薯,2015,29(1):57-60.
[14]应玲红,吴艺影,陈舒萍,等.粮食水分含量三种测定方法的对比分析[J].粮食科技与经济,2018,43(6):81-82.
[15]郭垠利.蛋白质含量测定方法研究[J].生物化工,2018,4(4):144-146,149.
[16]陈旭红.旋光法测定木薯粗淀粉的含量[J].食品工业科技,2000(2):66-67.
[17]王汉.荧光光谱电化学法测定维生素C[J].中国生化药物杂志,2012,33(2):129-132.
[18]刘烨,马微.测定食品中还原糖方法的研究[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2016,7(6):2 381-2 385.
[19]宋士伟,焦德志,陈旭,等.野大麦对干旱胁迫的生理响应与转录组分析[J/OL].干旱区研究,2019(5):1-11[2019-06-09].http:∥kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/65.1095.X.20190524.0944.010.html.
[20]宿飞飞,孙慕华,李勇,等.分根区交替灌溉对马铃薯叶片超微结构及生理性状的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(19):47-53.
[21]杜斌.交替沟灌夏玉米水分亏缺诊断与蒸腾估算研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.
[22]汪顺生,费良军,孙景生,等.控制性交替隔沟灌溉对夏玉米生理特性和水分生产效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(5):115-119,138.
PDF(247 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/