Habitat Quality Evaluation of Yongding River in Beijing Mountain Section after Ecological Rehydration

China Rural Water and Hydropower ›› 2021 ›› (2) : 30-36.

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The assessment of river habitat quality can provide an important basis for river ecological protection and restoration management. Combined with local ecology and environment, a river habitat quality assessment system is established by using hierarchical analysis method, which includes three habitats (channel habitat, bank habitat and riparian habitat). The river habitat quality of Beijing mountain section of the Yongding River is also assessed. The results show that the river habitat quality of the 30 sampling plots are good on the whole, with 8 sampling plots classified as “excellent”, 11 as “good”, and 11 as “moderate”. For different river reaches, the situation of overall river habitat quality and three habitats consistently show significant differences, ranking that Guanting to Zhuwo Reservoir > Zhuwo Dam to Luopoling Reservoir > Luopoling Reservoir to Sanjiadian Reservoir. Human activities, land use patterns, riparian vegetation structure and bank slope type have a significant influence on river habitat quality and water quality. This study can not only reflect the status of river habitat quality in Beijing mountain section after ecological water supply, but also provide a scientific basis for river ecological restoration and management.

Key words

river / index system / Habitat quality assessment / Yongding River / Beijing mountain section

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

. Habitat Quality Evaluation of Yongding River in Beijing Mountain Section after Ecological Rehydration. China Rural Water and Hydropower. 2021, 0(2): 30-36

References

[1]SOUTHWOOD TRE. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?[J]. Journal of animal ecology, 1977,46(2):336-365.
[2]王琼, 范志平, 李法云, 等. 蒲河流域河流生境质量综合评价及其与水质响应关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015,34(2):516-523.
[3]STALNAKER CB. The use of habitat structure preferenda for establishing flow regimes necessary for maintenance of fish habitat[M]. Springer US: 1979,321-337.
[4]WARD JV, Stanford JA. The Ecology of regulated streams: past accomplishments and directions for future research[M]. Springer US: 1987,391-409.
[5]JOWETT IG. Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches[J]. Regulated rivers research & management, 1997,13(2):115-127.
[6]王建华, 田景汉, 吕宪国. 挠力河流域河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(2):481-486．
[7]YANG T, WANG S, LI X P, et al. River habitat assessment for ecological restoration of wei river basin, China.[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018,25(17):1-14.
[8]徐彩彩. 辽河流域河流分类与生境评价研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2015.
[9]赵进勇, 董哲仁, 孙东亚. 河流生物栖息地评估研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2008,26(17):82-88.
[10]郑丙辉, 张远, 李英博. 辽河流域河流栖息地评价指标与评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007,27(6):928-936．
[11]LEE JH, KIL JT, JEONG. Evaluation of physical fish habitat quality enhancement designs in urban streams using a 2D hydrodynamic model[J]. Ecological engineering, 2010,36(10):1 251-1 259.
[12]VLEK HE, VERDONSCHOT PMF, NIJBOER RC. Towards a multimetric index for the assessment of Dutch streams using benthic macroinvertebrates[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004,516(1-3):173-189.
[13]刘瑛, 高甲荣, 崔强, 等. 4种国外河溪健康评价方法述评[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009,29(3):40-44.
[14]茹彤. 沣河河流生境调查与评价研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2015.
[15]LADSON AR, WHITE LJ, DOOLAN JA, et al. Development and Testing of an Index of Stream Condition for Waterway Management in Australia[J]. Freshwater biology, 1999,41(2):453-468.
[16]BRIERLEY GJ, COHEN T, FRYIRS K, et al. Post-European changes to the fluvial geomorphology of Bega catchment, Australia: implications for river ecology[J]. Freshwater biology, 1999,41:839-848.
[17]PETERSEN JR RC. The RCE: a riparian, channel, and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape[J]. Freshwater biology, 1992,27(2):295-306.
[18]董哲仁. 国外河流健康评估技术[J]. 水利水电技术, 2005,36(11):15-19.
[19]KIM JH, OH HM, KIM I S, et al. Ecological health assessments of an urban lotic ecosystem using a multimeric model along with physical habitat and chemical water quality assessments[J]. International journal of environmental research, 2013,7(3):659-668.
[20]唐涛, 蔡庆华, 刘建康. 河流生态系统健康及其评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002,13(9):136-139.
[21]阴琨, 李中宇, 赵然, 等. 松花江流域水生态环境质量评价研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2015,31(4):26-34.
[22]BELLETTI, B, RINALDI, M, BUIJSE, AD, et al. A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology[J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2015,73(5):2 079-2 100.
[23]陈淼, 苏晓磊, 党成强, 等. 三峡水库河流生境评价指标体系构建及应用[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(24):8 433-8 444.
[24]曾鹏, 汪昱昆, 刘垚燚, 等. 基于河段尺度的太湖流域城市河流生境评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020,31(2):581-589.
[25]刘华, 蔡颖, 於梦秋, 等. 太湖流域宜兴片河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012,31(5):1 288-1 295.
[26]萨茹拉, 刘来胜, 霍炜洁, 等. 北方缺水河流生境质量评价研究: 以妫水河为例[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2019,17(2):3-11.
[27]刘培斌, 高晓薇, 王利军, 等. 北京山区河流生态系统健康评价方法及其应用研究[J]. 水利水电技术，2016,47(1):98-101.
[28]陈淼, 苏晓磊, 黄慧敏, 等. 三峡库区河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(1):192-201.
[29]DING Y K, SHAN B Q, ZHAO Y. Assessment of river habitat quality in the hai river Basin, northern China[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015,12(9):11 699-11 717.
[30]雷呈, 黄琪, 倪才英, 等. 袁河流域河流生境质量评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(4):425-432.
[31]罗坤. 城市化背景下河流健康评价研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2017.

PDF(1013 KB)

544

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections

Recommended

Abstract
Key words
Cite this article
References

Received	Revised	Published
2020-04-08	2020-06-03	2021-02-15
Issue Date
2021-03-30

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

Abstract

Key words

Cite this article

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

References