
不同调亏灌溉模式对冬小麦生长、生理及产量的影响
王东博, 王书吉, 韩玉薪
不同调亏灌溉模式对冬小麦生长、生理及产量的影响
Effects of Different Regulated Deficit Irrigation Modes on Growth, Physiology and Yield of Winter Wheat
为探究拔节期不同亏水-复水模式对冬小麦生长、生理及产量的影响,设置了拔节期不同程度土壤含水率和亏水时长,土壤含水率分别为Y1(55%~65%)θf 、Y2(65%~75%)θf 、Y3(75%~85%)θf (θf 为田间持水量),亏水时长均为7 d,然后复水,另设全生育期充分灌水对照处理CK(85%~100%)θf,每个处理重复3次。复水7天后测定各处理冬小麦株高、叶绿素、净光合速率、荧光参数、产量及水分利用效率。结果表明: Y1、Y2、Y3各处理亏水7 d然后复水7 d后,与对照组CK相比,冬小麦株高分别提高了2.38%、9.52%、12.70%,叶绿素(SPAD)分别增长了0.67%、2.51%、3.85%,净光合速率分别降低了19.32%、14.02%、11.74%,Fv/Fm分别降低了9.64%、8.43%、6.02%,Fv/F 0分别降低了9.00%、5.91%、4.63%,发现亏水-复水处理后的冬小麦表现出明显的生长补偿效应;纵向和自身相比,较亏水7 d刚结束时株高、叶绿素(SPAD)、净光合速率、Fv/Fm和Fv/F 0分别提高了22.86%、25.96%、26.87%,17.46%、19.23%、21.73%,7.04%、6.61%、6.44% ,16.30%、16.87%、16.84%,12.20%、11.67%、11.88%。最终产量结果为:Y1、Y2、Y3各处理比CK分别低18.84%、5.58%、0.79%,Y3处理的产量相较于Y1与Y2处理分别高22.24%与5.08%。Y3处理的水分利用效率值最大,分别较Y1、Y2、CK处理提高了8.29%、0.55%、2.77%。Y3为节水稳产适宜亏水模式。
In order to explore the effects of different deficit-rewatering modes at jointing stage on the growth, physiology and yield of winter wheat, different degrees of soil moisture content and duration of water deficit were set at jointing stage in the experiments. The soil moisture content was set as Y1 treatment of (55%~65%) θf, Y2 treatment of (65%~75%) θf and Y3 treatment of (75%~85%) θf (θf is field capacity), the duration of water deficit was 7 days, and then the soil was rewatered. In addition, CK of (85%~100%) θf with full irrigation during the whole growth period was set as the control treatment. Each treatment was repeated 3 times. Plant height, chlorophyll, net photosynthetic rate, fluorescence parameters, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat were measured after rewatering for 7 days. The results showed that: the plant height of winter wheat in Y1,Y2 and Y3 treatments was increased by 2.38%,9.52% and 12.70%, and the chlorophyll (SPAD) was increased by 0.67%, 2.51% and 3.85%, respectively, compared with CK after 7 days of water deficit and rewatering. The net photosynthetic rate was increased by 7.04%, 6.61% and 6.44%, Fv/Fm was increased by 16.30%, 16.87% and 16.84%, and Fv/F 0 was increased by 12.20%,11.67% and 11.88%,respectively. It was found that the growth compensation effect was obvious in the winter wheat after deficit-rewatering treatment. Compared with itself at the end of 7 days of water deficit, plant height were increased by 22.86%, 25.96% and 26.87%, chlorophyll (SPAD) were increased by 17.46%, 19.23% and 21.73%, The net photosynthetic rate was increased by 7.04%, 6.61% and 6.44%,Fv/Fm was increased by 16.30%、16.87%、16.84%,and Fv/F 0 was increased by 12.20%,11.67% and 11.88%, respectively. The final yield of Y1,Y2 and Y3 treatment was 18.84%,5.78% and 0.79% lower than that of CK, respectively. The yield of Y3 treatment was 22.24% and 5.08% higher than that of Y1 and Y2 treatment,respectively. The water use efficiency of Y3 treatment was the highest,which was 8.29%,0.55% and 2.77% higher than that of Y1,Y2 and CK,respectively. So Y3 treatment is a suitable water deficit model for water saving and stable yield.
冬小麦 / 亏水-复水 / 水分利用效率 / 产量 / 亏水时长 / 调亏灌溉 / 水分胁迫 / 生长补偿效应 / 生理补偿效应 {{custom_keyword}} /
winter wheat / deficit-rewatering / water use efficiency / yield / water deficit last / regulated deficit irrigation / water stress / growth compensation effect / physiological compensation effect {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 土壤含水率Tab.1 Soil moisture content |
处理 | 含水率 | 水分处理 |
---|---|---|
Y1 | (55%~65%)θf | 亏水7 d后复水 |
Y2 | (65%~75%)θf | 亏水7 d后复水 |
Y3 | (75%~85%)θf | 亏水7 d后复水 |
CK | (85%~100%) θf | 全生育期充分灌溉 |
表2 冬小麦产量分析Tab.2 Yield analysis table of winter wheat |
处理 | 穗长/cm | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
Y1 | 4.55d | 30.88d | 6 008.11d |
Y2 | 4.74bc | 34.67c | 6 987.27c |
Y3 | 4.87b | 37.52b | 7 344.23b |
CK | 5.44a | 38.45a | 7 402.54a |
表3 不同处理对水分利用效率的影响Tab.3 Effects of different treatments on water use efficiency |
处理 | 净光合速率Pn/ (µmol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率Tr/ (g·m-2·s-1) | 叶片水分利用率/ (g·kg-1) | 作物耗水量ET/ mm | 水分利用效率WUE/ (kg·m-3 ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | 16.15d | 6.12c | 2.64c | 361.21d | 1.66d |
Y2 | 18.70c | 6.92b | 2.70b | 388.13c | 1.80b |
Y3 | 22.15b | 7.23a | 3.06a | 405.12b | 1.81a |
CK | 23.62a | 7.64a | 2.41c | 421.73a | 1.76c |
1 |
康绍忠.水安全与粮食安全[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2014,22(8):880-885.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
2 |
王育红,姚宇卿,吕军杰,等. 调亏灌溉对冬小麦光合特性及水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(3):59-62.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
3 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
4 |
ALI S,
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
5 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
6 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
7 |
李彦彬,边泽鹏,李道西,等. 花前干旱复水对冬小麦光合特性、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].中国农村水利水电,2020(6):130-134,138.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
8 |
黄彩霞,柴守玺,赵德明,等. 灌溉对干旱区冬小麦干物质积累、分配和产量的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(12):1 333-1 344.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
9 |
张笑培,王和洲,周新国,等. 拔节期水氮处理对冬小麦耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(12):19-26.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
10 |
李全起,沈加印,赵丹丹. 灌溉频率对冬小麦产量及叶片水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(3):33-36.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
11 |
杨宝斌,王利书,贾艳辉,等. 抽穗期水分胁迫对冬小麦光合特性的影响[J].节水灌溉,2020(12):88-93.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
12 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
13 |
丁端锋,蔡焕杰,王健,等. 玉米苗期调亏灌溉的复水补偿效应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(3):64-67.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
14 |
赵丽英,邓西平,山仑. 水分亏缺下作物补偿效应类型及机制研究概述[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(3):523-526.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
15 |
杨晓青,张岁岐,梁宗锁,等. 水分胁迫对不同抗旱类型冬小麦幼苗叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2004,24(5):812-816.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
16 |
李敏敏,袁军伟,韩斌,等. 干旱和复水对2种葡萄砧木叶片光合和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(1):221-226.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
17 |
马慧丽,吕德国. 干旱-复水处理对寒富苹果光合特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2014,29(4):181-185.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
18 |
周红亮,徐林峰,张丽娟,等. 水分胁迫及复水对滴灌甜菜冠层温度及光合生理特性的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2020,38(1):19-25.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
19 |
陈建,张光灿,张淑勇,等. 辽东楤木光合和蒸腾作用对光照和土壤水分的响应过程[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(6):1 185-1 190.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
20 |
马富举,杨程,张德奇,等. 灌水模式对冬小麦光合特性、水分利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(4):1 233-1 239.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
21 |
高丽华,孙书洪.不同时期水分胁迫对冬小麦产量及形态指标的影响研究[J].节水灌溉,2014(7):1-3.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |