灌区运行水平综合评价是灌区投资决策的首要依据,也是推进灌区现代化建设的基础。为提高灌区运行水平综合评价精度,本文以四川省7个典型灌区为例进行了实证研究。根据系统性、科学性及实用性等原则建立了灌区运行水平综合评价指标体系,运用博弈论法将G1法确定的主观赋权与改进熵权法确定的客观赋权进行综合赋权,基于加权秩和比法(加权RSR法)构建了灌区运行水平综合评价模型,结合四川省典型灌区的实际情况对7个典型灌区进行评估,基于加权秩和比法评价模型的结果表明:四川省7个典型灌区运行水平(加权RSR估计值)由高到低依次为金堂县团结水库灌区(0.7296)、安州区一大渠灌区(0.6807)、乐山市高中水库灌区(0.6461)、南充市磨尔滩水库灌区(0.6233)、夹江县东风堰灌区(0.5992)、阆中市石滩水库灌区(0.5744)和凉山州西礼灌区(0.5418),模型评价结果与灌区实际运行水平基本一致。因此可为灌区运行水平综合评价提供一种新的途径。
Abstract
The comprehensive evaluation of operation level of irrigation districts is the primary basis for investment decision-making in irrigation districts and also the basis for promoting the modernization of irrigation districts. In or der to improve the comprehensive evaluation accuracy of operation level of irrigation district, this text takes seven ty pical irrigation districts of Sichuan Province as an example to carry on the empirical research. Combined with the act ual situation in Sichuan irrigation district, taking all factors into consideration, it is established according to the princ iples of systematization, scientificity and practicability The comprehensive evaluation index system of operation leve l of irrigation district was established. The game theory was used to comprehensively determine the subjective empo werment determined by the G1 method and the objective empowerment determined by the improved entropy method. The results based on the weighted rank sum ratio method (Weighted RSR Method) show that the operation levels (weighted RSR estimates) of 7 typical irrigation districts in Sichuan Province are in the order of Tuanjie irriagtion district(0.7296), Yidaqu irriagtion district(0.6807), Gaozhong irriagtion district(0.6461), Moertan irriagtion district(0.6233), Dongfengyan irriagtion district(0.5992), Shitan irriagtion district(0.5744) and Xili irriagtion district(0.5418); The resulut of model evaluation are basically consistent with those of the irrigation district, which can provide a new method for the comprehensive evaluation of the operation level of the irrigation district method.
关键词
灌区 /
运行水平 /
综合评价 /
指标体系 /
综合权重 /
加权秩和比法
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
irrigation area /
operational level /
comprehensive evaluation /
indicator system /
combining weight /
Weighted Rank Sum Ration Method.
{{custom_keyword}} /
基金
“ 十 三 五 ” 国家重点研发计划课题项目
( 2016YFC0400206 ) ; 国家自然科学基金项目
( 51779161) ; “十 二 五”国家科技支撑计划课题项目 2015BAD24B01)
{{custom_fund}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]季仁保.我国灌区生态环境的探索与评价建议[J].水利发展研究, 2015, 无(10):22-25 [2]尹杰杰,崔远来,刘方平,等.基于模糊综合评价的赣抚平原灌区水资源承载力研究[J].节水灌溉, 2016, 无(8):131-140 [3]潘慧,汤树海,王绍民,等.基于TOPSIS模型的嫩江流域大型灌区评价[J].三峡大学学报自然科学版, 2015, 37(4):34-38 [4]王锦辉,费良军,谢芳,等.灰色关联理论-TOPSIS法的大型灌区运行状况综合评价[J].排灌机械工程学报, 2015, 33(11):985-990 [5]朱秀珍,李远华,崔远来,等.运用灰色关联法进行灌区运行状况综合评价[J].灌溉排水学报, 2004, 23(6):44-48 [6]费良军,孙洁,任长江,等.基于连续蚁群优化的投影寻踪灌区评价模型[J].排灌机械工程学报, 2014, 32(7):631-636 [7]王锦辉,费良军,王光社,等.改进突变理论对大型灌区运行状况的综合评价型[J].排灌机械工程学报, 2015, 33(5):429-433 [8]张振平,崔宁博,楼豫红,等.基于改进密切值法的灌区运行水平综合评价[J].灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35(10):90-96 [9]吴军虎,朱端端,刘叶伟,等.改进密切值法的灌区运行状况综合评价[J].灌溉排水学报, 2016, 34(10):883-888 [10]刘静,吴普特,王玉宝,等.基于数据包络分析的河套灌区农业生产效率评价[J].农业工程学报, 2014, 30(9):110-118 [11].司守奎,孙兆亮.数学建模算法与应用(第二版)[M].北京;国防工业出版社.2015:390-393. [12]付学谦,陈皓勇.基于加权秩和比法的电能质量综合评估[J].电力自动设备, 2015, 35(1):128-132 [13]柯淑芬,李真真.应用秩和比法综合评价护理工作质量[J].中华护理杂志, 2012, 47(1):72-74 [14]乌云格日勒.中国20个少数民族学生体质综合指标水平的判别与比较——秩和比(RSR)分析方法应用研究[J].中国体育科技, 2006, 42(3):81-84 [15]张云,谭平,黄佳栋.基于加权秩和比法的隔震连续梁桥在地震作用下的失效模式研究[J].西南交通大学学报, 2017, 52(6):1-7 [16]王书吉,费良军,雷雁斌,等.两种综合赋权法在灌区评价中的应用研究[J].西安理工大学学报, 2009, 25(2):207-211 [17]王书吉,姚兰,李飞,等.综合赋权法在灌区节水改造评价中的应用[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报自然科学版, 2008, 27(4):614-616 [18]费良军,王锦辉,王光社,等.基于改进熵权-G1-博弈论法的灌区运行状况综合评价[J].排灌机械工程学报, 2015, 33(10):895-900 [19]楼豫红,王务华.四川省灌区水利现代化的探索与实践[J].水利发展研究, 2013, 无(3):70-79 [20]齐学斌,黄仲冬,乔冬梅,等.灌区水资源合理配置研究进展[J].水科学进展, 2015, 无(2):287-295 [21]楼豫红.四川省用水户参与灌溉管理的实践及有关问题的思考[J].节水灌溉, 2007, 无(6):68-71 [22]KHALKHEILIT A, ZAMANI G H.Farmer participation in irrigation management: the case of Doroodzan Dam Irrigation Network,Iran[J].Agricultural water management, 2009, 96(5):859-865 [23]UYSAL?K, ATI?E.Assessing the performance of participatory irrigation management over time: A case study from Turkey[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(7):1017-1025