摘要
近年来,荷兰治水理念发生了颠覆性的变化,由持续了几个世纪的“与水争地”转变为今天的“还地于河”,还地于河计划于21世纪实施,成为新治水理念的工程代表。还地于河计划由34个子项目构成,主要工程措施分为9大类,主张水利工程建设与空间规划协调发展,最大限度兼顾防洪安全与空间品质提升,充分体现荷兰先进的治水理念和高超的工程技术。通过还地于河计划的实施背景介绍,典型案例分析,工程实践影响,探索新理念产生原因、理念内涵以及具体的工程设计特点,为我国治水理念创新和治水策略制定提供借鉴,最后总结荷兰还地于河计划实践对我国的启示,包括治水理念的由“争”到“让”;治水策略由“微观”到“宏观”的转变。
Abstract
In recent years, the Dutch water control concept has undergone a subversive change. It has been transformed from the “water competition” that has lasted for centuries to today's “return to the river”. In the 21st century, it was implemented in the river plan and became a new water control. The Yuhe River Project consists of 34 sub-projects. The main engineering measures are divided into 9 categories. It advocates the coordinated development of water conservancy project construction and spatial planning, maximizing the flood control safety and space quality, and fully embodying the advanced Dutch water control concept and superb engineering technology. Through the background introduction of the implementation of the river plan, typical case analysis, engineering practice influences the reasons, concept connotation and specific engineering design features of the new concept, and provides a reference for the innovation of water control concept and water management strategy in China. Finally, it concludes the enlightenment of the Dutch implementation of room for the river, including the concept of water management from “contending” to “yielding”, the strategy of water management from “single” to “multiple”.
关键词
还地于河 /
荷兰治水理念 /
工程措施
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
room for the river /
water management concept /
engineering measures
{{custom_keyword}} /
基金
海陆交互作用下海岸带韧性的时空演化特征与空间治理机制研究:以粤港澳大湾区为例;城市空间与避难行为的互动肌理研究:以地震灾害为例;气候变化影响下城市公共空间景观韧性机理与调适策略研究
{{custom_fund}}
王江波, 陈敏, 苟爱萍.
还地于河计划:荷兰新治水理念的发展与启示[J].中国农村水利水电, 2020(10): 77-87
WANG Jiang-bo , CHEN Min , GOU Ai-ping.
lan of Room for the River: The Development and Enlightenment of New Water Management Concept in Dutch[J].China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2020(10): 77-87
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]程宇航.“低洼之国”荷兰的防洪之道[J].老区建设,2016(13):54-56.
[2]黄日富.荷兰围海拦海工程考察的启示[J].南方国土资源,2006(6):18-21.
[3]胡月,张继权,刘兴朋,等.荷兰防洪综合管理体系及经验启示[J].国际城市规划,2011,26(4):37-41.
[4]曹哲静.荷兰空间规划中水治理思路的转变与管理体系探究[J].国际城市规划,2018,33(6):68-79.
[5]DE VEN V.人造低地-荷兰治水与围垦史[M].北京:星球地图出版社,2007:5-13.
[6]刘栋.荷兰小镇见证治水理念变迁[N].人民日报,2015-07-24[2019-12-11].
[7]郝晓地.荷兰水管理体制及水务局职能[J].给水排水,2003(9):26-30,100.
[8]于佳琳. 荷兰“还河流以空间”计划的空间策略分析[C]∥ 中国风景园林学会.中国风景园林学会2018年会论文集,2018:107-115.
[9]金海,廖四辉,刘蒨,等.荷兰新《水法》及其对我国的启示[J].中国水利,2015(6):59-61,47.
[10]黄延峰.荷兰奈梅亨市瓦尔河河道拓展项目[J].景观设计学,2018,6(4):86-97.
[11]方利平,吴倩.荷兰:从造坝拦水转向与水共生[J].生命与灾害,2010(10):28-29.
[12]斯蒂芬·奈豪斯,韩冰.圩田景观:荷兰低地的风景园林[J].风景园林,2016(8):38-57.
[13]向立云.中外防洪策略比较研究[J].水利发展研究,2003(5):12-18.
[14]武平.荷兰的治水经验[J].中国水利,1997(9):46-47.
[15]包晓斌.荷兰水资源管理途径与启示[J].河南水利与南水北调,2011(5):32-34.
[16]艾维.让洪水有路可走有地可蓄:国外抗洪排涝面面观[J].资源导刊,2016(8):56-57.
[17]ROHDE S,HOSTMANN M,PETERA K,et al. Room for rivers: An integrative search strategy for floodplain restoration[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,78(1).
[18]HANS, DE BRUIJNE M, TEN HEUVELHOF E. The Politics of Resilience in the Dutch ‘Room for the River’-project[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2015,44.