淠史杭灌区灌溉水有效利用系数实测与估算法比较

翟厚松

PDF(428 KB)
中国农村水利水电 ›› 2020 ›› (11) : 143-146.
农田水利

淠史杭灌区灌溉水有效利用系数实测与估算法比较

  • 翟厚松
作者信息 +

A Comparison of Practical Measurement and Estimation of Effective Utilization Coefficient of Irrigation Water in Pishihang Irrigation District

  • ZHAI HOU-SONG
Author information +
稿件信息 +

摘要

我国是一个水资源严重短缺的国家,农业用水占全部用水总量的一半以上,因此测算农田灌溉水有效利用系数、评估农业用水效率成为重要的课题。以2019年安徽省淠史杭灌区的淠河总干渠为实例,利用安徽省淠史杭灌区灌溉试验站的多年试验资料为基础估算灌溉水有效利用系数,并与首尾法测定结果进行对比。结果表明,2019年淠河总干渠灌溉片的灌溉水有效利用系数实测值为0.52,估算值为0.53。估算所得的净灌水量、灌溉水有效利用系数与实测法值的均方根误差(RMSE)分别为17.982 5和0.014 1,标准化均方根误差(MSR)分别为3.60%和1.39%,具有较好的准确性和稳定性,说明在特定条件下估算可以作为一种有效的测算灌溉水有效利用系数的方法,亦可用于大型灌区验证实测数据的准确性和可靠性。

Abstract

China is a country with severe water shortage. Agricultural water accounts for more than half of the total water consumption. Therefore, measuring the effective utilization coefficient of farmland irrigation water and assessing agricultural water efficiency have become important topics. This paper takes the Pihe Main Canal in Pishihang Irrigation District of Anhui Province in 2019 as an example, and uses the multi-year data of the Irrigation Experimental General Station in Pishihang Irrigation District of Anhui Province to estimate the irrigation water utilization coefficient and compare it with the first-place method. The results show that the measured value of the effective utilization factor of irrigation water for the irrigation channel of the Pihe Canal in 2019 is 0.52, and the estimated value is 0.53. Compared with measured methods, the RMSE of net irrigation from is estimation method 17.982 5, 0.014 1, and MSR is 3.60%, 1.39%, with better accuracy and stability indicating that the estimation method can be used as an effective method for measuring the effective utilization coefficient of irrigation water, and can also be used to verify the accuracy of data for large-scale irrigation districts.

关键词

灌溉水有效利用系数 / 实测法 / 估算法 / 对比分析

Key words

effective utilization coefficient of irrigation water / measurement method / estimation method / comparative analysis

引用本文

导出引用
翟厚松. 淠史杭灌区灌溉水有效利用系数实测与估算法比较[J].中国农村水利水电, 2020(11): 143-146
ZHAI HOU-SONG. A Comparison of Practical Measurement and Estimation of Effective Utilization Coefficient of Irrigation Water in Pishihang Irrigation District[J].China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2020(11): 143-146

参考文献

[1]朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 等. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(3):474-9.
[2]李英能. 浅论灌区灌溉水利用系数[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2003(7):23-26.
[3]彭世彰, 高晓丽. 提高灌溉水利用系数的探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2012(1):33-35.
[4]水利部. 中国水利统计年鉴2017[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2018.
[5]马晓河, 方松海. 中国的水资源状况与农业生产[J]. 中国农村经济,2006(10):4-11,19.
[6]高峰,赵竞成,许建中,等. 灌溉水利用系数测定方法研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2004(1):14-20.
[7]汪富贵. 大型灌区灌溉水利用系数的分析方法[J]. 节水灌溉, 2001(6):25-26,46.
[8]谢柳青, 李桂元, 余健来. 南方灌区灌溉水利用系数确定方法研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版), 2001(2):17-19.
[9]许建中, 赵竞成, 高峰, 等. 灌溉水利用系数传统测定方法存在问题及影响因素分析[J].中国水利, 2004(17):39-41,5.
[10]周和平, 张明义, 周琪, 等. 新疆地区农业灌溉水利用系数分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(22):100-107.
[11]姜冬梅, 王平. 双塔灌区灌溉水有效利用系数测算分析 [J]. 水利技术监督, 2019(6):212-4,8.
[12]李娟, 赵明宇. 内蒙古黄河南岸灌区灌溉水有效利用系数测试分析研究 [J]. 内蒙古水利, 2019(2):57-9.
[13]中华人民共和国水利部. 灌溉试验规范: SL13-2015[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2015.
[14]LIU X Y, XU J Z, LIU B Y, et al. A novel model of water-heat coupling for water-saving irrigated rice fields based on water and energy balance: Model formulation and verification[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019(233):1-19.
[15]肖雪, 王修贵, 谭丹, 等. 渠道衬砌对灌溉水有效利用系数的影响 [J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018,37(9):56-61.
[16]付强, 刘巍, 董淑华, 等. 黑龙江省灌溉水利用效率影响因素分析 [J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2017,25(2):286-95.
[17]冯保清. 我国不同分区灌溉水有效利用系数变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2013(6):29-32,35.
PDF(428 KB)

295

访问

0

引用

详细情况

段落导航
相关文章

/