植草沟对农村污水水质净化效果仍不清楚。为定量化评价植草沟对农村污水的净化效果，以厦门市英村为典型研究区，随机选取三处污水点，进行野外采样和室内试验，每次采样和实验均重复3次。分别测定BOD5、COD、氨氮、总氮和总磷的经过15和30 cm土柱的前后变化。结果显示，植草沟厚度为15 cm时，对BOD5、COD、氨氮、总氮和总磷的去除率为39.3%、52.0%、53.9%、36.2%、85.1%，且可完成大部分去除效果；植草沟厚度为30 cm时，对BOD5、COD、氨氮、总氮和总磷的去除率为56.0%、67.5%、64.8%、43.7%、64.6%。可见30 cm厚度的植草沟其净化效果的70%是在0~15 cm之间完成。植草沟对农村污水的净化效果明显，是改造硬化排污沟渠和改善农村生态环境的一种有效方式。
Abstract
The effect of grass planting ditch on rural sewage purification is still unclear. In order to quantitatively evaluate the purification effect of grass planting ditch on rural sewage, three sewage points are randomly selected in Yingcun of Xiamen City for field sampling and indoor test, and sampling and experiment are repeated three times. The changes of BOD5, COD, ammonia nitrogen, TN and TP after 15 and 30 cm soil columns are measured. The results show that the removal rates of BOD5, COD, ammonia nitrogen, TN and TP were 39.3%, 52.0%, 53.9%, 36.2% and 85.1%, and most of them could be removed when the thickness of the swale was 15 cm; the removal rates of BOD5, COD, ammonia nitrogen, TN and TP were 56.0%, 67.5%, 64.8%, 43.7% and 64.6% when the thickness of the swale was 30 cm. It can be seen that 70% of the purification effect of 30 cm thick grass planting ditch is completed between 0~15 cm, and less than 30% in the range of 15~30 cm.Grass planting ditch has obvious purification effect on rural sewage, which is an effective way to transform and harden the drainage ditch and improve the rural ecological environment.
关键词
植草沟 /
水质净化 /
农村污水 /
排污沟
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
grass ditch /
water purification /
rural sewage /
sewage ditch
{{custom_keyword}} /
基金
厦门市建设与管理局建设科技项目( XJK2018－1－2) ; 福 建省科技计划项目( 2019I10021)
{{custom_fund}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]梁祝,倪晋仁.农村生活污水处理技术与政策选择[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2007(3):18-22.
[2]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.2018年城乡建设统计年鉴[DB/OL]. (2017-12-23) [2018-10-01].http:∥www.mohurd.gov.cn/xytj/tjzljsxytjgb/index.html.
[3]谢林花,吴德礼,张亚雷.中国农村污水处理技术现状分析及评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(10):865-870.
[4]洪志国.新农村建设中生活污水处理现状及对策分析[J].建材与装饰,2019(27):160-161.
[5]侯京卫,范彬,曲波,等.农村污水排放特征研究述评[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(2):964-967.
[6]杨晓英,袁晋,姚明星,等.中国农村污水处理现状与发展对策：以苏南农村为例[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2016,55(2):183-188,198.
[7]张荣社,李广贺,周琪,等.潜流人工湿地负荷变化对脱氮效果的影响研究[J].环境科学,2006,2(11):253-256.
[8]傅大宝,姜红.海绵城市理念下植草沟的设计方法研究[J].中国给水排水,2017,33(20):70-75.
[9]李海燕,魏鹏,黄延,等.暴雨情况下传输型植被浅沟的净化效果研究[J].中国给水排水, 2014,30(1):99-103.
[10]汪艳宁,张杏娟,程方, 等.植被渗透浅沟对城市暴雨径流的调蓄效应研究[J].中国给水排水, 2012,28(5):61-63.
[11]许浩浩,吕伟娅.植草沟在城市降雨径流控制中的应用研究[J].人民珠江,2019,40(8):97-100,107.
[12]黄俊杰,沈庆然,李 田.植草沟对道路径流的水文控制效果研究[J].中国给水排水,2016,32(3):118-122.
[13]王龙涛.城镇生活污水及路面径流典型治理技术研究[D].武汉：华中农业大学,2016.
[14]王健,尹炜,叶闽,等.植草沟技术在面源污染控制中的研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(5):90-94.
[15]刘燕,尹澄清,车伍.植草沟在城市面源污染控制系统的应用[J].环境工程学报,2008,21(3):334-339.
[16]袁丽丽,吴冠仑,樊波,等.植草沟草种选择对降雨径流调蓄效应的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2019,54(1):137-143.
[17]REEVES E.Performance and condition of biofilters in the Pacific Northwest center for watershed protection. [J].Ellicott city MD, 2000,11(11):55-59.
[18]邢乃春,陈雷.粗砂填料基质和土壤渗滤系统在人工湿地应用中的污染物去除机理研究[J].水利规划与设计,2012,22(5):44-47.
[19]马丽珠,陈建中,和丽萍.土壤渗滤系统处理生活污水[J].环境科学导刊,2009,28(6):71-75.
[20]霍炜洁,周怀东,刘玲花,等.土壤—植物系统净化地表径流非点源污染物实验研究[J].水利水电技术,2013,44(6):26-31.
[21]李丹,王欣泽,沈剑,等.分流两段式土壤渗滤系统脱氮效果及机理研究[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(2):666-673.
[22]吕晶晶,窦艳艳,张列宇,等.改良型土壤渗滤系统处理生活污水脱氮除磷[J].环境工程,2018,36(3):38-43.
[23]李海波,李英华,孙铁珩,等.污水地下渗滤系统脱氮效果及动力学过程[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7 351-7 356.
[24]FlEMING-SINGER M S,HORNE A I.Enhanced nitrate removal efficiency in wetland microcosms using an episediment layer for denitrification[J]. Environmental science and technology, 2002, 36(6):1 231-1 237.
PDF(610 KB)
鄂公网安备 42010602001274号 鄂ICP备14015464号-1