
库木巴克引水枢纽工程闸前冲淤演变试验研究
郭秀吉, 陈立, 侯素珍, 王平
库木巴克引水枢纽工程闸前冲淤演变试验研究
Experimental Research on the Scouring and Silting Evolution in Front of Sluice of Kumbak Water Diversion Project
对拟建的库木巴克引水枢纽工程在河道不同地形及洪水工况下开展实体模型试验研究。试验结果表明:建闸前后试验河段均表现为沿程冲刷,冲刷强度上段大下段小。自然条件下闸前断面冲刷呈深“V”型河槽,建闸后根据枢纽调度方式的不同,当流量小于800 m3/s时,闸前断面冲刷为“W”型河槽,断面最低点位于导流墙附近冲刷坑,较冲沙闸底板高程偏低0.91 m;当流量大于800 m3/s时,闸前断面均匀冲刷,河槽相对平整,断面最低点位于泄洪闸附近,较泄洪闸底板高程偏低1.11 m。建闸后试验河段壅水影响范围最大为3 660 m,受壅水及枢纽抬高运行水位影响,长期高水位及侵蚀作用,导致滩岸稳定性降低。
This paper carries out the model experiment for the planned Kumbak water division project under different topography and frequency flood conditions of the river channel. The result shows that before and after the construction of the project, the test river section is scoured along the river, and the scouring intensity of the upper section is more than that of the lower section. Under natural conditions, the scouring of the section in front of the sluice presents a “V” shaped channel. After the construction of the project, according to the different dispatching modes of the sluice, when the upstream flow is less than 800 m3/s, the scouring of the section in front of the sluice presents a “W” shaped channel, the lowest point of the section is located in the scour hole near the diversion wall and is 0.91 m lower than the bottom elevation of the sand-sluicing sluice. When the flow is more than 800 m3/s, the section shape in front of the sluice is relatively flat, the lowest point of the section is near the flood-discharging sluice and is 1.11 m lower than the bottom elevation of the flood-discharging sluice. The maximum backwater influence scope of the test reach is 3 660 m upstream of the gate site, affected by backwater and raising water level of the project, the long-term high water level and erosion leads to the decrease in the stability of the right bank.
引水枢纽 / 实体模型 / 闸前冲淤 / 壅水 {{custom_keyword}} /
water diversion project / entity model / scouring and silting in front of sluice / backwater {{custom_keyword}} /
1 |
王柏明,史英标,杨元平.潮汐河口闸上河床演变对建闸的响应[J].水电能源科学,2011,29(5):99-102.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
2 |
俞健.金沟河渠首漏斗及涡管排沙应用成果分析[J].水利规划与设计,2014(6):79-82.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
3 |
柯春光,刘锋,邱秀云,等.金沟河引水枢纽分水排沙试验研究[J].人民黄河,2012,34(8):46-47.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
4 |
张明义,孙娟,戚印鑫.新疆叶尔羌河中游渠首整体水工模型试验研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2011(1):133-135.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
5 |
施文红,时京林,施文军.玉龙喀什河洪水成因分析[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2012,48(12):4-6.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
6 |
张红武,江恩惠,赵新建,等.黄河高含沙洪水模型的相似条件[J].人民黄河,1995(4):1-3,61.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
7 |
胡艳芬,余明辉,吴卫民.变态对河工模型中弯道水流相似性的影响[J].水科学进展,2007(1):63-67.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
8 |
黄东,郑国栋,郑邦民.河工模型相似的精度及误差探讨[J].水动力学研究与进展(A辑),2005(5):565-570.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
9 |
徐敏,陈立,何俊,等.选沙相似律对模型沙波相似性影响的试验研究[J].水科学进展,2017,28(5):712-719.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
10 |
闵凤阳,姚仕明,黎礼刚.模型沙特性研究进展[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(2):79-86.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
11 |
魏炳乾,龚秀秀,严培,等.基于水流黏滞性的模型沙选择[J].水利水运工程学报,2016(4):27-31.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
12 |
国志鹏.无坝引水枢纽工程闸前泥沙淤积特性实验研究[J].水利技术监督,2017,25(1):96-99.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
13 |
杨纪伟,李静,王志国,等.无坝引水工程闸前泥沙淤积分析[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(2):290-293.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
14 |
王普庆,王平.阿拉尔拦河闸蓄水运用后闸前泥沙淤积特点及清淤措施探讨[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39():95-98.
增刊2
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
15 |
刘华欣,董克鹏.玉龙喀什河拦河闸水位流量关系的推求[J].内蒙古水利,2012(4):153-154.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |