摘要
抗滑稳定分析是多软弱夹层高重力坝坝基设计工作中的关键内容。针对某一高重力坝工程,采用刚体极限平衡三滑面法与有限元强度折减法相结合的研究手段,开展了抗滑稳定计算分析,并确定了适宜的泥化夹层坝基处理措施。研究结果表明,刚体极限平衡三滑面法与双滑面法相比,抗滑稳定结果更为准确、合理,更适合用于软弱夹层坝基的重力坝深层抗滑稳定计算;提出的4种坝基处理方案中,抗剪洞方案的安全可靠性高、工期短、投资低,可优先作为重力坝坝基处理方案;采用有限元强度折减法计算了抗剪洞方案下的坝基深层滑动破坏模式和抗滑稳定安全系数,与三滑面法的计算结果相比,抗滑稳定计算结果相差不大,验证了抗滑稳定分析结果的准确性和所选坝基处理措施的有效性。本研究为类似工程抗滑稳定计算及坝基处理设计提供了参考依据。
Abstract
The anti-slide stability analysis is a critical part in the design of gravity dam foundation with multi-soft interlayer. According to a high gravity dam, the research method combining limited equilibrium method with three sliding surfaces and finite element strength reduction method is adopted. Meanwhile, the anti-slide stability analysis is carried out, and the appropriate treatment measures for the dam foundation with mud interlayer are determined. The results show that compared with the limited equilibrium method with two sliding surfaces, the limited equilibrium method with three sliding can provide a more accurate and reasonable anti-sliding stability results, and is more suitable for the calculation of deep anti-sliding stability of gravity dam with soft interlayer. Among the four dam foundation treatment schemes, the anti-shear hole scheme is highly safe and reliable and has a short construction period, and low investment, and can be preferentially used as a dam foundation treatment scheme. The finite element method strength reduction method is used to calculate the deep sliding failure mode and anti-sliding stability safety factor of the dam foundation under the anti-shear hole scheme. Compared with the three-sliding surface method, the wjzhang2006@163.com。 anti-sliding stability calculation results are similar, proving the correctness of the anti-sliding stability analysis and the effectiveness of selected dam foundation treatment measure. This study provides a reference for the anti-sliding stability calculation and dam foundation treatment design of similar projects.
关键词
软弱夹层 /
重力坝 /
三滑面模式 /
坝基处理 /
强度折减法
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
soft interlayer /
gravity dam /
three sliding surface mode /
dam foundation treatment /
strength reduction method
{{custom_keyword}} /
基金
深水水库排沙系统吸排与射流造浆协同机制;淤损水库库容恢复及淤积物处理利用技术与示范;深水水库自吸式管道排沙系统吸泥头高效吸泥技术研究;有压管道逆坡段泥沙输移规律研究
{{custom_fund}}
胡能明 张文皎 宋志宇 徐威.
多软弱夹层坝基高重力坝深层抗滑稳定与加固措施研究[J].中国农村水利水电, 2021(2): 170-174
.
Research on the Deep Anti-slide Stability and Reinforcement Measures of the High Concrete Gravity Dam with the Multi-Soft Interlayer Foundation[J].China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021(2): 170-174
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]王飞,李同春,胡继刚,等.复杂地基上重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J].人民长江,2011,42(S2):61-63,70.
[2]张晓燕,任旭华,邵勇.软弱夹层对碾压混凝土重力坝的动力影响分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2008(8):94-97.
[3]赵引,任青文,陆晓敏.向家坝水电站重力坝深浅层抗滑稳定分析[J].水利水电科技进展,2008(2):47-51.
[4]张津生.浅析刚体极限平衡法-探讨重力坝深层抗滑稳定的安全判据[J].水力发电学报,2005,24(5):26-33.
[5]涂承义,常晓林,刘东.观音岩重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2011(1):105-107.
[6]陈祖煜,王玉杰,孙平. 三峡大坝3#坝段深层抗滑稳定分析[J].中国科学:技术科学,2017(8):34-42.
[7]段庆伟,陈祖煜,王玉杰,等.重力坝抗滑稳定的强度折减法探讨及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(s2):4 510-4 517.
[8]张朝辉.基于强度折减法的复杂地基重力坝抗滑稳定分析[J].人民珠江,2015,36(3):73-75.
[9]周泽,周峰.重力坝深层抗滑稳定计算探讨[J].岩土力学,2008(6):1 719-1 722.
[10]胡嫣然,陈静.刚体极限平衡法子坝基深层抗滑稳定计算中的应用[J].安徽建筑大学学报,2019(27):36-41.
[11]彭文明,姚雷.建基面与软弱结构面组合的抗滑稳定分析方法探讨[J].长江科学院院报,2014,31(4):46-47.
[12]万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,等.边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J].岩土力学,2010(7):2 283-2 288,2 316.